upper waypoint

Prop. 30: Increase Income Taxes on Rich Californians to Fund Green Infrastructure

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

electric vehicles in a parking lot
Proposition 30 would have taxed California's richest residents to fund electric-vehicle infrastructure projects and wildfire mitigation. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

We need to spend a lot of money on green infrastructure if we want to lower emissions and adapt to the climate crisis. Supporters of Proposition 30 say this measure would help the state do just that — by raising the state income tax by 1.75% on Californians who make more than $2 million a year. That money would be guaranteed for 3 things: electric car debates, electric car charging, and wildfire suppression.

The political coalitions on this one are super confusing: The ‘Yes” side includes environmental justice groups, prominent Democrats, and the ride-hailing app Lyft. The “No” side includes groups that oppose tax increases like the California Republican Party, the Chamber of Commerce, and — perhaps surprisingly — Gov. Gavin Newsom and the California Teachers’ Association.

Guest: Kevin Stark, KQED science senior editor


Read the transcript

Your support makes KQED podcasts possible. You can show your love by going to https://kqed.org/donate/podcasts.

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
California Law Letting Property Owners Split Lots to Build New Homes Is 'Unconstitutional,' Judge RulesAlameda: The Island That Almost Wasn’tJust Days Left to Apply for California Program That Helps Pay for Your First HouseIn Fresno’s Chinatown, High-Speed Rail Sparks Hope and Debate Within ResidentsUC Regent John Pérez on the Gaza Protests Roiling College CampusesNPR's Sarah McCammon on Leaving the Evangelical ChurchIs California Headed For Another Tax Revolt?KQED Youth Takeover: We’re Getting a WNBA TeamUSC Cancels Main Graduation Ceremony Amid Ongoing Gaza ProtestsThis Literary Expert Reveals the Key Problem Undermining American Education